The science behind HR: what you need to know to recruit top talent in IT

When recruiting developers, what do you think you rely on? You most likely reach out to the candidate, check their social media profiles, talk to them, and ask them to write some code.

It may seem like a lot of ways to get to know a potential employee, but there’s actually one important thing that can get in the way of finding “the one”.

A pink, spongy thing: your brain.

The fact that we’re wired to make judgements subconsciously doesn’t mean it’s impossible to hire the best candidate. It means you simply have to be aware of psychological mechanisms at play so you can prepare ahead and reduce your innate bias.

Here’s the psychological background behind recruitment in IT you can’t afford to ignore.

I, me, my, mine

Let’s take a look at everyone’s favourite topic: the self. What you’re about to read will come in handy not only when you’re first reaching out to the candidate, but throughout the whole recruitment process.  
As discovered in University of Liverpool research, people spend approximately 30% to 40% of everyday conversations talking about themselves. These numbers are even higher when it comes to social media communication. According to Rutgers University research entitled “Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams”, 80% of communication on Twitter comes from so-called meformers (people who typically post content related to themselves and their thoughts), as opposed to informers, who constitute only 20% of Twitter’s population.

giphy-2

You may also be interested in Harvard University research using neuroimaging and cognitive methods to determine whether “disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding”. Research findings suggest that “we get a biochemical buzz from self-disclosure” because of the way our brains function.

Need proof? In of the experiments, researchers talked to participants during an fMRI scan. When participants discussed themselves and shared personal information, activity in the reward areas of the brain was recorded. Conversely, talking about other people didn’t result in any activity in these areas.

Interestingly, talking about the self-activated neural regions which are part of the mesolimbic dopamine system typically engaged in responses to pleasure like sex and food.

Why is this important for recruiters?

We’re biologically wired to focus on ourselves, and our career choices impact us more than other people. For that reason, you should start your initial outreach with talking about the developer you’re contacting, and not yourself. Remember that everybody’s favourite topic is themselves.

Take advice from recruiter Rachel Saunders who reveals that personalized outreach increases your chances of hiring, with mildly-tailored communication getting a 25% response rate, and highly-tailored communication receiving 60% to 70% of responses. You need to do your homework and let your dream candidates know you’ve taken the time to analyze their profiles. Talk about THEM to get their brain interested

I strongly recommend Rachel Saunders’ 4-ingredient recipe for top tech talent outreach:

  1. Find something personal about the person that they’ve publicly shared over social media, like interests, hobbies, or passions.
  2. Look for content related to that interest, i.e. an article or a resource and share it with them in a personalized email. Start a relationship in a more informal way to stand out.
  3. Once you do that, get to what she calls “their superpower” and talk about the skills that you found interesting.
  4. Finally, ask whether they’d be open to have a quick chat about their career. To quote Rachel, the “goal is to make it clear I understand now might not be the right time, but that I’d still like to get to know them better and earn their trust in the event we are a potential fit in the future.”

Remember that good developers get a tonne of outreach so you need to make sure you cut through the clutter. Personalization is no longer an option but a necessity.

First impressions & gut feeling

You’re probably aware that people draw trait inferences from the appearance of others, and I regret to inform you’re not an exception.

Have you heard of the theory that we make judgements about people in 7 seconds?

image

According to the study by Janine Willis and Alexander Todorov of Princeton University, it takes even less time as we make up our mind “after a 100-Ms exposure to a face”. That’s a decisecond, or one-tenth of a second. It’s basically how long it takes you to blink.

Willis and Todorov’s research suggests that “judgments made after a 100-ms exposure correlated highly with judgments made in the absence of time constraints, suggesting that this exposure time was sufficient for participants to form an impression.” Although longer exposure somewhat differentiated the judgements of some participants, it also boosted confidence for many of the judgements.

Sounds pretty gloomy because it suggests that it doesn’t matter what you can or cannot do, you either win or lose before you even open your mouth.

That said, you should know that Todorov’s later research proves that’s not 100% true.

Later research by Todorov and Jenny M. Porter corrected earlier experiments which relied on exposure to single images of many people. Todorov’s and Porter’s study fixed the issue because they relied on multiple images of the same person. Results show much more variety in how people perceived the person analyzed.

This is great news because “images of the same individual can lead to different impressions, with within-individual image variance comparable to or exceeding between-individuals variance for a variety of social judgments”. This means we tend to favour different representations of the same people for different purposes (like for dating, political campaign, or job interviews). It also means it’s not that easy to be fooled when you see more than one impression from your candidate, which you do when you get to talk to them.

First impressions in HR

If you work in recruitment, I highly recommend a study by Mattersight which points out the real value of first impressions in the recruitment process. According to data gathered in the course of the research, a staggering 80% of employees “say they would take one job over another based purely on personal connections formed during the interview”.

keanu2

This is HUGE for recruitment professionals because HR is often where that first contact happens.

Think of your HR representatives as ambassadors of your company if you want to recruit and retain top tech workforce.

Remember that first impressions are a double-edged sword – you’re making inferences during the interview, but so is the candidate. Make sure you come across as likeable and try to establish rapport early on.

Affinity effect
If you still think that you’re 100% unbiased when interviewing developers in your recruitment process, think again. Ever heard the old adage “birds of feather flock together”?

giphy-3

The team of Harvard has worked out why we tend to choose people who remind us of… ourselves. In research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, team of Harvard University revealed that medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) “is engaged both when we are introspective about ourselves and when we make inferences about the minds of others who have leanings perceived to be similar to our own”.

bild1

Source: OUPblog 

In other words, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) is active when people think about themselves or others like them, and does not show activity when they think of people who they don’t associate with. The upper part of MPFC indicates judgments about different people and, to quote Adriana Jenkins of Harvard University, “once you have a little piece of information about someone being similar to you or different, you seem to take it and run with it. You may think they are similar to you across the board, even though you may not have much reason to think this. It is rather surprising.”

Why is this important for HR professionals?

Findings of research by Harvard team suggest we tend to empathize more with people who we believe are similar to us in some respect. This means that if you rely on interviews and resumes without checking the knowledge of technical minutia, you might be subconsciously sabotaging your recruitment process.

On the one hand, that’s not actually a bad thing, because it allows you to hire for company culture. On the other, there’s a risk you might hire people who you subconsciously feel are similar to yourself, and not people who are best for the job.

Motivation 3.0

Once you start discussing details with the candidate, what should you talk about to make them interested?

Think about what motivates people (and no, it’s not just the money). According to Dan Pink, it’s actually:

  • Autonomy – the desire to direct our own life,
  • Mastery – the need to keep getting better at what we do,
  • Purpose – believing we can make a difference in the world with what we do.

Autonomy, mastery and purpose are intrinsic motivators different from the traditional “carrots and sticks” extrinsic motivators.

d8224267-aee6-4ae0-9983-3acfa1055462

Source: Practical Workplace Wisdom 

Make sure to watch Pink’s TED talk on motivation (with almost 17 million views!):


According to Pink, it’s time to move away from relying solely on extrinsic rewards (also called “the carrots-and-sticks”, or “motivation 2.0”) towards intrinsic satisfaction (referred to as “motivation 3.0”). Pink believes that “there is a mismatch between what science knows and what business does” and quotes extensive research suggesting that monetary rewards can actually backfire in more complex tasks. He argues that monetary incentives tend to narrow our focus, so they work for simple tasks. For more complex ones you want to do the opposite so shortening focus is bound to make the process more difficult than it actually is. Pink also points out that monetary incentives tend to work well for short-term goals, but may have a negative effect on long-term ones. It must be highlighted that fair pay is necessary, but your organization should also do all it takes to foster intrinsic satisfaction.

Dan Pink is not alone to believe so: findings of research by Harvard Business School Professor Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer suggest that “over 90% of leaders don’t understand what motivates people”.

In the course of the research, Amabile and Kramer “surveyed 669 managers at all levels of management, from dozens of companies and various industries around the world”. They asked survey participants to rank the importance of five employee motivators: incentives, recognition, clear goals, interpersonal support, and progress in the work. Surprisingly, only 8% of respondents selected the biggest motivator – progress. According to Amabile and Kramer “when workers sense they’re making headway, their drive to succeed is at its peak.” This means that contrary to what many people believe, it’s not all about the money.

Of course, top tech talent needs adequate pay, but you need way more to make the devs stay with your company. You need to pay people fairly and adequately AND you need to make sure you appeal to intrinsic motivators. You should mention both intrinsic and extrinsic motivators early on when discussing the vacancy.

Furthermore, research by Dale Carnegie Training suggests that you should also make sure that immediate superior of your hires is competent and caring. Research findings suggest that if they’re not satisfied with their immediate management, there is an 80% chance that employees will become disengaged.

Just take a look at these numbers:

“26% of Engaged Employees would leave their current job for just a 5% pay increase.

46% of Partially Engaged Employees would leave their current job for just a 5% pay increase.

69% of Disengaged Employees would leave their current job for just a 5% pay increase.”

You really need to make sure that the people you recruit stay around, as bad hires cost A LOT.  In fact, hiring bad programmers has been named by Paul Graham as one of the main mistakes that kill startups.

How to alleviate the effects of all the abovementioned psychological mechanisms?

When looking for developers:

  1. Probe their technical skills.

Stop asking people to invert binary trees on a whiteboard. Instead, start assessing programmers in their natural environment. Emulate their first day at work and the tasks they will be asked to complete if hired.

  1. Don’t be a jerk.

Remember the Mattersight study saying that people are more likely to accept a job if they like the person who interviewed them? Don’t forget that technical interviews “should be a collaborative conversation and not combative interrogation” – be fair and give people a chance to talk and to showcase their knowledge during programming assessment.

  1. Rely on opinion of others.

Ask a colleague to join the interview so your MPFC won’t get in the way. Don’t let your personal bias run wild: remember that you want diversity, not a clone army.

5ba6f8d27654c0f656486ca09c7507a5

  1. Test knowledge of libraries and frameworks.

According to Laurie Voss, “a good engineer will try to maximize productivity by using libraries to solve all but the most novel problems”. Don’t just ask people to come up with a commonly known solution – try to single out good engineers by testing the right skills. Remember that you need to hire people who will succeed in that particular position, and not these who excel at interviews.

  1. Use intrinsic and extrinsic motivators to make people stay.

Of course money can make or break a deal, but let the candidates know there’s way more than that. Autonomy, mastery & purpose should be your organization’s new BFF.

Ready to recruit?

 

Share the article ...
36
Share the article ...
36